15th Amendment Of Indian Constitution

15th amendment of indian constitution

15th amendment of Indian Constitution proposed amending Article 217. The judges of the High Court were thus able to retire at sixty-two years of age instead of sixty. The retiring High Court judge was allowed to serve as an ad-hoc judge of the Supreme Court by a revised version of article 128. Additionally, the change offered a compensation allowance to judges migrating from one High Court to another, by the new clause of article 222.

Read this article further to learn more about the changes done by the 15th amendment of Indian Constitution. Also, you will understand the reason behind the need for such amendment and much more such information. This will be worth reading for you if you are preparing for a competitive examination like UPSC. This is included in the Indian Polity of UPSC Syllabus.

15th Amendment Of Indian Constitution

The 15th amendment of Indian constitution was passed in 1963. The Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Act, 1963, may be used to refer to this legislation.

The High Court can now issue writs to any individual, Government, or authority even those outsides of their geographical jurisdiction, if the cause of action originates inside the territorial boundary, thanks to the 15th Amendment of Indian Constitution.

With the amendment of article 217, high court judges must now retire at sixty-two years of age rather than sixty. Amendment also outlined the process for figuring out the judges’ ages on the Supreme Court and the High Court. Judges who are transferred from one high court to another must get compensation, according to new clause (2) of Article 222.

Objects And Reasons

The Constitution has been subject to many proposed amendments over the years. In November 1955, the Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Bill was presented to Lok Sabha. This was done to make some of them effective. The Bill was unable to move forward for a variety of reasons. Everything else, with the exception of the one relating to the amendment of Article 3 of the Constitution, was allowed to expire. The Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Act of 1955 made a distinct amendment to this article.

Some of the provisions from the Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Bill are contained in the current Bill. There are a few more proposals for amendment to the Constitution as well. The Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Bill included amendments to the Constitution’s articles 276, 297, 311, and 316. The modifications have been made to these articles with a few minor alterations. In addition to entry 78 of the Union List, the proposed amendments also impact articles 124, 128, 217, 220, 222, 224A, and 226.

The High Court judge’s age of retirement was changed under Article 217, going from sixty to sixty-two years. The President must make a decision whenever there is a dispute over a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court’s proper age. A precise provision in articles 124, as well as 217, is suggested in order to articulate the decision.

make your upsc preparation faster with examarly

Judges should be moved from one High Court to another, only if it is deemed to be in the public’s interest and by consensus. The Judge who is so transferred might anticipate facing an increased financial burden as a result of this move. Therefore, it is suggested that he get a compensatory allowance in addition to his wage. The provision of article 220 provides that a Judge who is transferred from one High Court to another is not allowed to reopen his legal firm in any of the High Courts where he previously served as a Judge. As a result, the provisions of article 220 put a stop to any request to transfer a High Court judge.

It is therefore proposed that the prohibition on resumed practice in Article 220 be changed such that it only applies to the High Court from which the Judge retires if he spent at least five years working for that High Court before retiring. Transfer of judges would be made easier by such a clause. The Punjab High Court is the sole High Court that has jurisdiction with respect to the Central Government, according to the current wording of Article 226 of the Constitution. The other new recommendations are of a minor character.

Major Provisions

  1. Amendment of article 124 -In article 124, a new clause (2A) was added. It suggests that the authority and procedure that Parliament may legally govern will decide the age of a Supreme Court judge. (Section 2)
  2. A revised version of Article 128 allows for the appointment of a retired judge from a High Court to serve as a judge of the Supreme Court. (Section 3)
  3. By an amendment to Article 217, Clause (1), a High Court Judge’s retirement age has been raised from 60 to 62. With retroactive effect, a new clause (3) was added to article 217. That allows the President to decide the age of a judge of a High court after consulting with the Chief Justice of India. (Section 4)
  4. Section 5 adds a new clause (2) to Article 222 that states that judges who are transferred from one high court to another must receive a compensatory allowance.
  5. A new article 224A is introduced in Section 7. It allows for the appointment of a former High Court judge to serve as a High Court judge.
  6. Article 226 was amended to include clause (1A). It states that the High Court, whose territorial jurisdiction the cause of action originates under, may also have the ability to issue directives, orders, or writs to any government, authority, or person, even if their seat or place of abode is beyond the high court’s territorial jurisdiction. (Section 8)
  7. Article 297 now reads “territorial waters,” followed by the term “or the continental shelf,” as stated in Section 9.
  8. In particular, Section 10 adds new clauses to Article 311 in place of the existing clauses (2) and (3). This was done to ensure that any civil servant facing a proposed action of dismissal, removal, or reduction in rank is informed of the charges and given a reasonable opportunity to be heard at the inquiry stage. But, when the action is taking place, the civil servant’s reasonable opportunity would be limited to making a representation based on the evidence presented.
  9. Section 11 of Article 136 inserts a new clause (1A). As a result, a Public Service Commission may select an acting chairman when the regular chairman is absent, on leave, or otherwise unable to perform his duties.
  10. Amendment of the Seventh Schedule- In the Seventh Schedule, Entry 78 in List 1 has been changed to clarify that “vacations” is included in the definition of “organization” there. (Section 12)

Conclusion

The High Court has the power to issue writs or directions to any Government, person, or organization, even if their seat or place of residence is outside of those territories, so long as the cause of action originated there, thanks to the 15th amendment of Indian Constitution. This amendment also allows High court judges to retire at age 62 as opposed to 60, and also outlined the process for determining the age of judges of the High Court and Supreme Court.

faster better and easier upsc preparation with examarly

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article
11th amendment of indian constitution

11th Amendment Of Indian Constitution

Next Article
ghiyas ud din balban

Ghiyas Ud Din Balban: 9th Sultan Of Slave Dynasty